Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
J Clin Pathol ; 75(12): 793-797, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2064246

ABSTRACT

After almost 3 years of intense study, the immunological basis of COVID-19 is better understood. Patients who suffer severe disease have a chaotic, destructive immune response. Many patients with severe COVID-19 produce high titres of non-neutralising antibodies, which are unable to sterilise the infection. In contrast, there is increasing evidence that a rapid, balanced cellular immune response is required to eliminate the virus and mitigate disease severity. In the longer term, memory T cell responses, following infection or vaccination, play a critical role in protection against SARS-CoV-2.Given the pivotal role of cellular immunity in the response to COVID-19, diagnostic T cell assays for SARS-CoV-2 may be of particular value for immunodeficient patients. A diagnostic SARS-CoV-2 T cell assay would be of utility for immunocompromised patients who are unable to produce antibodies or have passively acquired antibodies from subcutaneous or intravenous immunoglobulin (SCIG/IVIG) replacement. In many antibody-deficient patients, cellular responses are preserved. SARS-CoV-2 T cell assays may identify breakthrough infections if reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) or rapid antigen tests (RATs) are not undertaken during the window of viral shedding. In addition to utility in patients with immunodeficiency, memory T cell responses could also identify chronically symptomatic patients with long COVID-19 who were infected early in the pandemic. These individuals may have been infected before the availability of reliable RT-qPCR and RAT tests and their antibodies may have waned. T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 have greater durability than antibodies and can also distinguish patients with infection from vaccinated individuals.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , Antibodies, Viral , Pandemics , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
2.
J Clin Med ; 11(15)2022 Jul 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1969310

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The profile of cellular immunological responses of children across the spectrum of COVID-19, ranging from acute SARS-CoV-2 infection to full recovery or Long COVID, has not yet been fully investigated. METHODS: We examined and compared cytokines in sera and cell subsets in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (B and regulatory T lymphocytes) collected from four distinct groups of children, distributed as follows: younger than 18 years of age with either acute SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 49); fully recovered from COVID-19 (n = 32); with persistent symptoms (Long COVID, n = 51); and healthy controls (n = 9). RESULTS: In the later stages after SARS-CoV-2 infection, the cohorts of children, both with recovered and persistent symptoms, showed skewed T and B subsets, with remarkable differences when compared with children at the onset of the infection and with controls. The frequencies of IgD+CD27- naïve B cells, IgD+IgM+ and CD27-IgM+CD38dim B cells were higher in children with recent infection than in those with an older history of disease (p < 0.0001 for all); similarly, the total and natural Tregs compartments were more represented in children at onset when compared with Long COVID (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0005, respectively). Despite the heterogeneity, partially due to age, sex and infection incidence, the susceptibility of certain children to develop persistent symptoms after infection appeared to be associated with the imbalance of the adaptive immune response. Following up and comparing recovered versus Long COVID patients, we analyzed the role of circulating naïve and switched B and regulatory T lymphocytes in counteracting the evolution of the symptomatology emerged, finding an interesting correlation between the amount and ability to reconstitute the natural Tregs component with the persistence of symptoms (linear regression, p = 0.0026). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we suggest that children affected by Long COVID may have a compromised ability to switch from the innate to the adaptive immune response, as supported by our data showing a contraction of naïve and switched B cell compartment and an unstable balance of regulatory T lymphocytes occurring in these children. However, further prospective immunological studies are needed to better clarify which factors (epigenetic, diet, environment, etc.) are involved in the impairment of the immunological mechanisms in the Long COVID patients.

3.
Expert Rev Clin Immunol ; 18(6): 557-565, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1819661

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 has had a calamitous impact on the global community. Apart from at least 6 M deaths, hundreds of millions have been infected and a much greater number have been plunged into poverty. Vaccines have been effective but financial and logistical challenges have hampered their rapid global deployment. Vaccine disparities have allowed the emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants including delta and omicron, perpetuating the pandemic. AREAS COVERED: The immunological response to SARS-CoV-2 is now better understood. Many of the clinical manifestations of severe disease are a consequence of immune dysregulation triggered by the virus. This may explain the lack of efficacy of antiviral treatments, such as convalescent plasma infusions, given later in the disease. EXPERT OPINION: T cells play a crucial role in both the outcome of COVID-19 as well as the protective response to vaccines. Vaccines do not prevent infection but reduce the risk of a chaotic and destructive cellular immune response to the virus. Severe COVID-19 should be considered a virus-induced secondary immune dysregulatory disorder of cellular immunity, with broad host susceptibility. This perspective of COVID-19 will lead to better diagnostic tests, vaccines, and therapeutic strategies in the future.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Immune System Diseases , Vaccines , COVID-19/therapy , Humans , Immunization, Passive , SARS-CoV-2 , T-Lymphocytes , COVID-19 Serotherapy
4.
Expert Rev Clin Immunol ; 18(4): 335-345, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1709289

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The immunological response to COVID-19 is only partly understood. It is increasingly clear that the virus triggers an inappropriate host inflammatory reaction in patients experiencing severe disease. AREAS COVERED: The role of antibodies in COVID-19 remains to be fully defined. There is evidence for both protection and harm in different clinical syndromes triggered by SARS-CoV-2. Many patients dying from COVID-19 had both high titers of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and elevated viral loads. The uncertain protective role of humoral immunity is mirrored by the lack of benefit of therapeutic convalescent plasma infusions in COVID-19. In contrast, there is increasing evidence that a vigorous T-cell response is protective. Delayed or low avidity T cell reactions were seen in patients suffering severe COVID-19. EXPERT OPINION: These observations suggest T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 are the dominant long-term protective mechanism following either infection or vaccination. The magnitude and quality of the antibody response is likely to reflect underlying T cell immunity to SARS-CoV-2. Much of what has been learned about COVID-19 will need to be revised following the recent rapid emergence and dominance of the omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/therapy , Humans , Immunization, Passive , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Serotherapy
7.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 9(10): 3575-3583, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1284170

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 has had a calamitous effect on the global community. Despite intense study, the immunologic response to the infection is only partially understood. In addition to older age and ethnicity, patients with comorbidities including obesity, diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, malignancy, renal, and pulmonary disease may experience severe outcomes. Some patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) and secondary immunodeficiency also appear to be at increased risk from COVID-19. In addition to vulnerability to SARS-CoV-2, patients with PIDs often have chronic pulmonary disease and may not respond to vaccines, which exacerbates their long-term risk. Patients with common variable immunodeficiency disorders, the most frequent symptomatic PID in adults and children, have a spectrum of B- and T-cell defects. It may be possible to stratify their risk for severe COVID-19 based on age, ethnicity, the severity of the T-cell defect, and the presence of other comorbidities. Patients with common variable immunodeficiency disorders and other immunodeficiencies are at risk for Chronic COVID-19, a dangerous stalemate between a suboptimal immune response and SARS-CoV-2. Intra-host viral evolution could result in the rapid emergence of vaccine-resistant mutants and variants of high consequence; it is a public health emergency. Vaccination and prevention of Chronic COVID-19 in immunodeficient patients is therefore of the utmost priority. Having a reliable diagnostic assay for T-cell immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is critical for evaluating responses to vaccines in these patients. New treatments for SARS-CoV-2 such as NZACE2-Patari are likely to be particularly beneficial for immunodeficient patients, especially those who fail to mount a robust T-cell response to COVID-19 vaccines.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Common Variable Immunodeficiency , Aged , COVID-19 Vaccines , Common Variable Immunodeficiency/epidemiology , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , T-Lymphocytes
8.
Expert Rev Clin Immunol ; 17(5): 421-430, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1145096

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Diagnostic tests play a critical role in the management of Sars-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19. There are two groups of tests, which are in widespread use to identify patients who have contracted the virus. The commonly used reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) test becomes negative once viral shedding ceases by approximately 2-3weeks. Antibody tests directed to viral antigens become positive after the second week of infection. IgG antibody responses to the virus are muted in children, pregnant females, and those with mild symptoms. IgA and IgM antibodies rapidly wane, although IgG antibodies directed to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike (S) glycoprotein are more durable. Current data show variability in the sensitivity of commercial and in-house antibody tests to SARS-CoV-2.Areas covered: The role of T cells in acute illness is uncertain, but long-term protection against the virus may rely on memory T cell responses. Measuring memory T cell responses is important for retrospective confirmation of cases, who may have been infected early in the pandemic before reliable RT-qPCR tests were available and whose SARS-CoV-2 antibodies may have become undetectable. Relevant peer-reviewed published references from PubMed are included up to 15 March 2021.Expert opinion: After surveying the literature, the authors present the case for urgent development of diagnostic T cell assays for SARS-CoV-2 by accredited laboratories.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/immunology , Immunologic Memory , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Humans , Immunoassay
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL